Pat Condell
Pat is an indefatigable maker of YouTube videos. He is
very articulate and has one or two hobby horses. A man should have a hobby
horse (or two)!
Here are some of mine:
·
Catholicism rocks.
·
Socialism sucks.
·
Islam is a bad plan for Humanity.
·
Free markets are the only mechanism for
creating wealth and improving life for the poor.
·
Democracy is dangerous without a moral
electorate.
·
Climate Change (man-made) is a crock.
·
Abortion is an unambiguous evil.
How many hobby horses am I allowed? My decision!
I like Pat very much and have watched dozens of his
videos. Unsurprisingly, the ones I like most are the ones that reinforce my own
prejudices – I may soon post a defence of prejudice. He is very rude about
Islam, though not about Muslims in general.
He hates religion – and here I have to part from
him. I believe that bad religion is very bad, just as bad science is very bad.
I think that I can tell the difference. Pat doesn't differentiate. He stands up
bravely for ‘western’ values without acknowledging that they owe their
existence largely to Christianity. The history of the Church is not without
blemishes but, in my not-very-humble view, you do not have to be an outsider to
critique the Church’s historical failings. The best critiques of evil deeds
committed by Christians come from Christian theology.
Digression:
I should hate to be understood to be saying that ‘modern’ Christianity is good,
whereas Christians in the past did wicked things. Christians in the past did do
wicked things. For example, the conquistadors treated the peoples of South
America abominably. They were roundly condemned by Spanish Scholastics. Another
example, from our own day: some who call themselves Christians practise
abortion; the Catholic Church has a simple ruling on abortion: it is wicked.
Pat Condell was, I think, brought up as a Catholic.
Like many ex-Catholic atheists he has a particular animus against Catholicism.
So, I am taken aback when he attacks Catholic beliefs. A couple of instances
will do: he maintains (like Dawkins and Mark Twain) that Faith (one of the
three theological virtues) means ‘believing what you know ain’t true’. I want
to ask him, ‘Is that what you thought when you were a Catholic?’ It certainly
isn’t what I believe. He seems to believe that Christians wish to impose
Christianity upon everybody else. Free Will is foundational to Christianity.
Coercion is contrary to Christian belief.
I am much more lenient on him for his representation
of Islam. Here he seems much fairer than he is to Christianity. He opposes
Islam, yes. But the Islam he opposes is the Islam that Muslims themselves
espouse. We frequently see Muslims carrying placards rejecting Democracy and
Freedom. We never see Catholics doing the equivalent: demanding the beheading
of those who are unbaptized. David Wood and Robert Spencer are better informed
about the Koran, Mohammed, the Hadith and Shari’ah than Pat Condell is (than I
am). They too dislike Islam and use Islamic sources to reveal what they
dislike. Pat opposes paper-and-ink Islamic texts and flesh-and-blood Muslims
but his Christian targets are straw men.
The Church is shrinking in the West, though growing
in Africa and Asia. America without Christianity is a grim thought; but there
have been countless revivals in the past – not that I expect to embrace all revivalists.
I will include a couple of links to PC’s videos,
chosen more or less at random.
No comments:
Post a Comment